《書目答問》與《四庫全書總目》別史類分類之比較

序號 9
刊名 大學圖書館
年份 2005
出版月份 3月
卷期 Vol.9 No.1
作者 蔡天怡
作者任職單位 國立臺灣大學歷史學系
摘要

「別史」是史部類例中較晚出現的,在史部的地位亦相當模糊。雖然可以「上不至於正史,下不至於離史」概括說明,卻不易清楚界定其範圍。歷來書目設有別史類者,更是屈指可數。《書目答問》與《四庫全書總目》是近代兩部重要的書目,其史部皆有別史一類。本文乃以此二書目為主,比較其別史類所收圖書分類之異同,希望有助於釐清別史之特性。

關鍵字 別史類史部分類四庫全書總目書目答問
頁碼 143-156
全文 全文下載 (42)
DOI
Review
Title A Comparative Study of Historical Classification of Bie-shi in Shu-mu Da-wen and Si-ku Quan-shu Zong-mu
Author Tien-I Tsai
Author's title Department of History, National Taiwan University
Abstract

The utilization of Bie-shi (alternative histories) as a class in traditional historical classification began in Sung Dynasty. Bie-shi is usually defined as “a category which is not as formal as Zheng-shi (Official Dynastic Histories), but not as casual as Za-shi (Miscellaneous histories).” Still, the meaning and coverage of Bie-shi is not quite clear and well-established. It was not a common category employed in traditional historical classification schemes either. Shu-mu Da-wen (Answers to Inquiries into Bibliography) and Si-ku Quan-shu Zong-mu (Annotated Catalog of the Si-ku Collection) are two important bibliographies in Qing Dynasty. They both employed Bie-shi as a category to classify related works. This study attempts to compare and analyze the historical works that were classified in Bie-shi category of these two bibliographies. The goal is to provide a clearer picture about the characteristics of Bie-shi.

Keywords Shu-mu Da-wen(Answers to Inquiries into Bibliography)Si-ku Quan-shu Zong-mu(Arnnotated Catalog of the Si-ku Collection)The Alternative Histories (bie-ahi)the Historiography categories
fulltext 全文下載 (42)
DOI