吳宇凡

私人藏書有其既定之脈絡與意涵，而這樣的脈絡包含著書籍擁有者個人的思想詮釋，除表現於書籍的選擇上，更體現於書籍所呈現的分類與排列順序。目前各典藏單位對於私人捐贈圖書的管理過於重視「捐贈」意涵之呈現，相較捐贈者之生平、捐贈之動機及使用書籍時保留其中的「思維」卻未具體描述與保存，闕而弗如，對於研究相同領域的閱讀者而言，失去了藉由書籍擁有者對於其所典藏書籍的分類與擺放順序，進一步地瞭解其對於該書的想法與思維的機會。本文即焦注私人藏書的原始架構對於呈現原擁有者的思維脈絡的重要性進行探討，整理
國內外相關文獻，分析我國文化典藏單位對於私人捐贈藏書的管理方式，並針對現行方式提出質疑與建議，以茲相關單位參考。

Private book collections are endowed with specific contexts and meanings, which include the collector’s own interpretations displayed in the selections, classifications and arrangement of books. Collecting institutes tend to overemphasize the meaning of “donation,” without probing into the specific descriptions and preservations of the
collected items. This negligence thus prevents the researchers from further understanding the contexts of how books are classified. This essay looks into the contextual framework of original management of private book collections by sorting out related literature and analyzing the management models. Consequently, the research also provides certain inquiries and recommendations for the collecting institutes.

本文係採用問卷法分析我國大學校院校史館建置及其經營管理現況，問卷調查重點在於瞭解各校校史館之設置與命名、行政隸屬與營運、人員與館舍、館藏與管理、數位化與加值應用等面向問題。問卷調查以普查方式，總計發放162份，回收有效問卷95 份。研究發現各校設置校史館比例僅及一半，其行政隸屬多在祕書室或圖書館之下，預算與人力資源不夠，校史館典藏與管理制度有待健全，對於校史資料檢索與展覽推廣觀念，仍待加強。根據研究結果提出我國大學校院校史館未來發展相關建議。

The purposes of this study are to examine the current planning and management of university archives in Taiwan. This survey focuses on various aspects concerning university archives such as the establishment, nomenclature, administrative subordination, operation, personnel, premises, collection, management, digitalization and value-added applications. The 162 questionnaires were mailed to all the universities in Taiwan, while 95 valid questionnaires were returned. The results show that (1) nearly half of the universities set up the university archives, (2) concerning the administrative structure, university archive usually belongs to the secretariat or library, (3) the budget and personnel are insufficient, (4) the collection and management need to be improved, (5)the access to university archives should be more user-friendly, and (6) the exhibition of university archives need to be strongly promoted. Finally, this study proposes suggestions of how to develop and manage university archives in the future.